Legal Opinion

Warren v. Ellis

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1919No. Civ. No. 2601PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George E. Crothers, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend.

The action was instituted by plaintiffs, claiming to he the heirs at law of one Mabel Moulton, deceased, for the purpose of recovering a judgment vacating and setting aside certain judgments and decrees previously made in the matter of said estate, and also vacating a certain judgment made and entered in an action theretofore commenced and prosecuted to final judgment by defendant herein against the administrator thereof. The amended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Lynch v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Abels v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Kandjounzeff v. GardinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Clavey v. LoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API