Legal Opinion

Ferguson Ranch, Inc. v. Murray

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1991No. 90-166PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

This was an action by appellees Edward F. Murray, Jr. and William J. Edwards (M & E) against Ferguson Ranch, Inc. to obtain a right of way, termed a common law way of necessity, across Ferguson lands, Ferguson appeals the judgment granting M & E the right of way.

The question we must answer is this: Where a grantee takes title to a parcel of property which has no adequate means of ingress/egress (is landlocked), is the grant- or obligated to provide his grantee with a common law way of necessity without compensation therefor, or must the grantee obtain a private road in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McGuire v. McGuireWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Leo Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Snell v. RuppertWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Roediger v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Walton v. DanaWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hulse v. First American Title Co. of Crook CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mayland v. FlitnerWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Parkhurst v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Seherr-thoss v. Teton County Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Greenwalt v. Ram Restaurant Corp. of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API