Legal Opinion

Bowman v. City of Newburyport

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 31, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

These are two actions of tort, tried together. The plaintiff in the first action, a minor, seeks to recover damages for personal injuries, and the plaintiff in the second, his father, to recover for consequential damages. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in each action, but, under leave reserved and subject to the plaintiffs’ exceptions, verdicts were entered for the defendant. It is apparent that the declarations are drawn under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 84, § 15, to recover damages for a defect in a public way.

*480The jury could have found that at about eleven o’clock in the forenoon of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kinnear v. General Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Whalen v. Worcester Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Kelleher v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Urban v. Central Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Pratt v. Inhabitants of WeymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Huff v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Trum v. Town of PaxtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Whittaker v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Delgado v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Weiss v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API