Legal Opinion

Botsford v. Chase

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo; Buck, J. Case by James E. Botsford against Nehemiah Chase ■ for slander. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

Plaintiff, with defendant and other persons, at Kalamazoo, in the year 1892, organized what is known as the Botsford Paper-Mill Company, as a corporation. The capital stock was $100,000. The plaintiff took $10,000 of the stock, and defendant also became a large shareholder therein. The plaintiff became the general manager of the company, and the defendant its president. The whole capital stock was paid in, and the mill built and equipped in April, 1893. It was then discovered that the capital stock was not large enough, and it was increased to $120,000. Thereafter it was increased to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Newman v. SteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Leavell v. LeavellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Darling v. MansfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Sanford v. HoughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Kelley v. PaulsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API