Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Houghton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1915No. Docket No. 72PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Livingston; Miner, J. Case by Mildred Sanford against James Houghton for slander. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action of trespass on the case to recover damages for slander. The case was tried by a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $325. A motion was made for a new trial, which motion was overruled; the trial court filing written reasons for so. doing. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The only errors relied upon which call for discussion are grouped by counsel for appellant as follows:

“(1) Error in permitting the plaintiff to be recalled for further direct examination after cross-ex-*46animation had been waived and in refusing to strike out this evidence.
“(2)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Derham v. DerhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Farrand v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Loranger v. LorangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Randall v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Botsford v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conroy v. Fall River Herald News Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Darling v. MansfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. McCloy v. VaughanMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API