Mitchell A. Insignares v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Mitchel A. Insignares, a Florida prisoner, appeals the district judge’s denial of his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.1 Because resen-tencing by the state judge resulted in a new judgment, making this the first challenge to that new judgment, we conclude Insignares’s petition is not successive. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Underlying Conviction
In the early morning hours of July 5, 2000, Antonio Houed left the Pink Pony, a Miami strip club, to return to his house. *1276When he arrived home, he noticed a man, later identified as Insignares, had…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Michael Stansell v.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- DeLawrence King v. Donald MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Ace Patterson v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Demetrius Osbourne v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Steven Romansky v. Superintendent Greene SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.