Legal Opinion

Tyrone Palmer v. Metro-North Railroad Company

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 10, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00102Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Tyrone Palmer, Civil No. 3:25-CV-00102 (MPS) Plaintiff, v. Metro-North Railroad Company, December 10, 2025 Defendant. RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL Plaintiff moves to compel Defendant Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (“MNR”) to permit Plaintiff, his counsel and a non-expert designated by Plaintiff to conduct an onsite inspection at Defendant’s Croton, New York Shop and/or Yard.1 Notice of Inspection Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 34(a)(2), the Plaintiff and his attorneys in the above- entitled matter hereby give notice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re PE Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
  2. Hindle v. National Bulk Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API