Legal Opinion

Kanapaska v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 25, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages based on the breach of an insurance contract, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ferraro, J.), entered February 27, 1985, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated May 2, 1985, which is in favor of the defendant and against him.

Appeal from the order entered February 27, 1985, dismissed (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Fleming v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Orester v. Dayton Rubber Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Fleming v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Philips v. Republic InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LanganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Hold Bros., Inc. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Grand Metro Transit Mix Corp. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API