Legal Opinion
Tindley v. Salt Lake City School District
Utah Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 2005No. 20030581PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Justice:
¶ 1 This appeal concerns the constitutionality of section 63-30-34 of the Utah Governmental Immunity Act, which limits the damages recoverable in actions against the state or its political subdivisions. 1 Plaintiffs brought this action against the Salt Lake City School District (the “District”), asserting that the limitation violates both the Utah and the United States Constitutions. The District successfully moved for summary judgment. Plaintiffs appealed. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 David Smith was employed by the District as a teacher and debate team coach at Highland High…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Yanero v. DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CandedoUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- Scott v. Universal Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
- Zauflik v. Pennsbury School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.