Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Frohmiller
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1942No. Civil No. 4569PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
— C. Earl Rogers, plaintiff, filed an original petition in mandamus in this court against Ana Frohmiller, as state auditor, defendant, requiring her to approve certain claims for salary presented by him.
The facts of the case are not in dispute, and may be stated as follows: Up to December 12, 1941, E. T. Houston was a duly qualified and acting member of the industrial commission of Arizona, for the term which expired on January 8, 1942. On March 11, 1941, the Governor of Arizona submitted to the state senate the nomination of I. Perle McBride as a member of said commission for the term…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- West Wisconsin R. Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Trempealeau Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Badger v. United States Ex Rel. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- State Ex Rel. SULLIVAN v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Keen v. FeatherstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. WhelanIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Estate of Garner v. SchindlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.