Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 23, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickerson, J.

Charles H. Rutherford, Jr., administrator of the estate of Ernest Parker, a judgment creditor of Leila Parker, filed this bill to subject a fund in the chancery court belonging to Leila Parker to the satisfaction of his judgment. He alleged that the judgment was unpaid; defendant had no funds from which it could be satisfied except the fund, in court sought to b.e subjected;, defendant was a nonresident; and-prayed for an attachment of the fund, publication, and application of fund to his judgment.

Such suit is authorized in this state. Code Section 10352; Scott County National Bank v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jourolmon v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State v. Bank of CommerceTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Borches & Co. v. Arbuckle Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hull v. VaughnTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Hale v. SanduskyTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API