Legal Opinion

Hale v. Sandusky

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice G-reeN

We have brought this case up from the Court of Appeals to consider a single question — whether a homestead right exists in certain land in Wayne County. The chancellor and the Court of Appeals answered this question in the affirmative.

The complainant Elpha Hale was formerly the wife of J! N. Pigg, who died intestate June 25,1930, leaving her and ¡five childrén surviving. At the time of Pigg’s death he owned this land, consisting of about 98 acres. The value of the land was less than $1,000, and a home stead in the whole of it accordingly passed to his widow by operation of law without any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. VaughnTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Carver v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Carrigan v. RowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Coile v. HudginsTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. McElroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hughett v. HughettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  2. Rutherford v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API