Jackson v. . Thomas
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Plaintiff’s evidence tends to show a subrogated claim for funeral expenses, Ray v. Honeycutt, 119 N. C., 510, 26 S. E., 127, 60 C. J., 725, a legacy due plaintiff’s intestate, Redmond v. Burroughs, 63 N. C., 242, and undistributed assets of the estate. In re Estate of Bost, ante, 440; Caffey v. Osborne, 210 N. C., 252, 186 S. E., 364. This would seem to defeat the motion for nonsuit, as none of the statutes of limitations is a complete bar upon the facts presently appearing of record. Moreover, the plea of the statutes of limitations would seem to be bad, Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N. C., 642,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- W. T. and J. K. Redmond v. . Burroughs .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- G. D. Ray & Son Ex Rel. Young v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Turner v. ShufflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Turner v. . ShufflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allen v. SeaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958