Legal Opinion

Smith v. City Council of Rome

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1855No. 20PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application for injunction. Decision by Judge Trippe, at Chambers, 27th June, 1855. Vm. R. Smith prayed an injunction on the following facts: He was the owner of a parcel of land within the corporate limits of the City of Rome, upon which lot there is a valuable stone quarry, worth. $3,000, upon the bank of Etowah River; also a valuable sand bank, worth $>1.000; and the piece of land' is also of great value as a residence, viz: $2,500. The Mayor & Council of Romo quarried…

Read the full summary

Application for injunction. Decision by Judge Trippe, at Chambers, 27th June, 1855. Vm. R. Smith prayed an injunction on the following facts: He was the owner of a parcel of land within the corporate limits of the City of Rome, upon which lot there is a valuable stone quarry, worth. $3,000, upon the bank of Etowah River; also a valuable sand bank, worth $>1.000; and the piece of land' is also of great value as a residence, viz: $2,500. The Mayor & Council of Romo quarried large quantities of rock from the said land, removed trees therefrom, and thereby caused irreparable injury to the lot.…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

In this case, we assume that the answer is true.

The answer says, in substance, that the complainant gave-to the defendant the right to open two public streets through, his land; that the defendant, in the exercise of this right, *91opened the two streets; that a “high rocky bluff” projects itself a part of the way across the track of one of the streets; that the defendant took from this bluff, at a point within the boundaries of the street, some rock, and used the rock in macadamizing the streets of Rome and in building culverts; and that the…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Brigham v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. University v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Nichols v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. S. H. Kress & Co. v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API