Legal Opinion
Mashburn v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 18, 1999No. 97-2543-CIVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING ROYAL CARIBBEAN’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SEITZ, District Judge.
THIS MATTER came before the Court on Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.’s (“Royal Caribbean”) Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. Royal Caribbean instituted this limitation action pursuant to the Limitation of Vessel Owner’s Liability Act, 46 App. U.S.C. §§ 181-188 (the “Limitation Act”), and FedR.Civ.P. Supplemental Rule F. After this action was initiated, Barbara Mashburn filed her claim for damages, and brought counterclaims against Royal Caribbean and Mark Hom-men.
This action arises out of an accident…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Lottie Everett and Robert Everett, Cross-Appellants v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the complaint of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- In Re the Complaint of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- In Re the Complaint of Royal Carribean Cruises Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- In Re the Complaint of Moran Towing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- In Re the Complaint of Del-Marine, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.