Estate of Bluestein v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Van Fossan, Judge:
The first issue is whether the respondent erred by including in the gross estate all of the assets standing in the decedent’s name at his death.
It is appropriate that we summarize the essential facts in order to emphasize the nature of the problem.
The decedent, A. Bluestein, after several unsuccessful business ventures, moved to Corpus Christi, Texas, in 1914 and entered into a partnership to operate a small clothing store. Within a few years the decedent became the sole proprietor. He began this venture with an original capital of $1,000 borrowed on a life insurance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Freuler v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lusthaus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Spiegel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dulles v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Straight Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Carty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- Dulles v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Commercial Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.