Legal Opinion

People v. Robinson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1977No. Crim. 29214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Defendant was convicted of forcible rape, forcible oral copulation, and robbery. Allegations in each of the three counts that he was armed with a deadly weapon within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022 were found true. Defendant was sentenced to consecutive -state prison sentences on the rape and robbery counts. He was sentenced to state prison on the other count concurrently. The allegations of use of a deadly weapon were incorporated in the judgment as eventually modified except for the count charging robbery.

On this appeal from the judgment, defendant contends: (1)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. PikeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In re CulbrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. OrabuenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. People v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API