Legal Opinion

Isaac v. Town of Queensbury

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRippey, J.

The causes of action alleged in the several complaints herein arose out of the same transaction and are grounded in negligence and nuisance. They were tried together and resulted in verdicts in favor of the several plaintiffs upon which separate judgments were entered. Upon appeal, the several judgments and orders denying motions for a new trial were reversed upon the law and the facts and the complaints dismissed. We must presume that the jury found every fact in favor of plaintiffs necessary to sustain their verdicts if there was any supporting evidence. In examining the record to see if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Queens County Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Graham v. Town of UrbanaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Laitenberger v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Seelye v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1942
  3. Ehrenberg v. PersonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Geraghty v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API