Legal Opinion

WeWork Companies Inc. v. Weplus (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 27, 2019No. 5:18-cv-04543Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 WEWORK COMPANIES INC., 8 Case No. 5:18-cv-04543-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER 10 FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL WEPLUS (SHANGHAI) TECHNOLOGY PROCEDURE 12(b)(1) 11 CO., LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 49 12 Defendants. 13 Before the Court is Defendant We+ (Shanghai) Technology’s motion to dismiss for lack of 14 subject-matter jurisdiction (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)) and failure to state a claim upon which relief 15 can be granted (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). Motion to Dismiss…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API