Legal Opinion

Vega v. Eastern Courtyard Associates

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2001No. 33932, 34059PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*437OPINION

By the Court,

Rose, J.:

In these consolidated appeals1 we are asked to determine whether the violation of a validly adopted building code provision constitutes negligence per se. We conclude that the violation of a building code provision adopted by a county ordinance is negligence per se if the plaintiff belongs to the class of persons the building code provision is intended to protect, and the injury the plaintiff suffered is of the type the provision was intended to prevent. Accordingly, because the district court failed to properly instruct the jury regarding the negligence per se…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Huang v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. County of Clark Ex Rel. University Medical Center v. UpchurchNevada Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. PARKER BLDG. SERVICES CO., INC. v. LightseySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Chavez v. SieversNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Larson v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
  4. Mazzeo v. GibbonsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
  5. Williams v. University Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API