Vega v. Eastern Courtyard Associates
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*437OPINION
By the Court,
Rose, J.:
In these consolidated appeals1 we are asked to determine whether the violation of a validly adopted building code provision constitutes negligence per se. We conclude that the violation of a building code provision adopted by a county ordinance is negligence per se if the plaintiff belongs to the class of persons the building code provision is intended to protect, and the injury the plaintiff suffered is of the type the provision was intended to prevent. Accordingly, because the district court failed to properly instruct the jury regarding the negligence per se…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Huang v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- County of Clark Ex Rel. University Medical Center v. UpchurchNevada Supreme Court · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- PARKER BLDG. SERVICES CO., INC. v. LightseySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Chavez v. SieversNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Larson v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
- Mazzeo v. GibbonsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
- Williams v. University Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.