Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Akzo Nobel, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 17, 2001No. 99-CV-6583LPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs commenced this action on November 23, 1999, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., to recover certain retirement benefits allegedly due them under the Akzo Nobel Retirement Account Plan (“the Plan”). The original complaint contained six causes of action, under ERISA and other federal and state theories of liability, and named as defendants Akzo Nobel, Inc. (“Akzo”), the Plan, by its representative, Akzo Nobel Retirement Account Plan Pension Committee (“the Committee”), and Cargill,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Louis Carter v. Dutchess Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Gloria Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan and Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Falk v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berk v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Casciani v. NesbittDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009