Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Warner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1894PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Certiorari to Chippewa. (Steere, J..) Relator applied to the circuit court for a mandamus to ■compel respondent to issue a warrant for the arrest of a person charged with the violation of a rule adopted by the State Board of Health under Act No. 47, Laws of 1893, and brings certiorari to review an order denying the writ. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The relator, who is prosecuting attor*240ney for the county of Chippewa, on the 24th of November, 1893, presented to the respondent, who is a justice of the peace of said county, a complaint alleging that one Robert B. Finch was a station agent of the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company at Sault Ste. Marie, and on the 23d of November, 1893, was in charge of a train belonging to said railway company; that on said train there was baggage, consisting of clothing, wearing apparel, etc., belonging to one Edmund Watelet, an immigrant, late of Havre, France, who was traveling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  3. Georgia Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Ex parte CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. In re GrinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Adams v. BurdgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. King v. Concordia Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. McCartyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API