Legal Opinion
United States v. Sir Walter Raleigh Bouye, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 9, 1982No. 81-2159PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Per curiam
Sir Walter Raleigh Bouye, Jr. challenges the validity of his federal bank robbery conviction. He makes two contentions on appeal. He first argues that, the district court committed reversible error when it refused to strike the testimony of witnesses (linking him to the scene of the crime) on the ground that their identities had not been disclosed to him prior to the trial. Second, Bouye claims that the district court should have admitted the testimony of eyewitnesses of another bank robbery that the man in the bank surveillance photographs in this case was the same individual who had…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Jackie Presser Harold Friedman and Anthony HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Irving L. NapueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Albert Dupuy, United States of America v. Christie Buzard, United States of America v. Juan Antonio TerceroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.