Legal Opinion

Wenclawiak v. Sieracki Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1925No. Appeal, 202PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This appeal involves a bill to enforce a contract for the sale of real estate. The chancellor stated, in the adjudication, the conclusion of law that “the burden of proof rests on plaintiff to sustain by credible evidence all the allegations contained in his bill which are denied by the answers of defendants.” He also found the following facts: (1) That defendants held the legal title to the real estate in controversy as tenants by entireties; (2) that one of the defendants, Maryanna Sieracki, the wife of Albert Sieracki, codefendant, had not executed the agreement or the receipt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. CockinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Kime v. Tobyhanna Creek Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. CooneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Smith v. Perry, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API