Commonwealth v. Ford
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
Clarence Ford took this appeal from a sentence for rape imposed after a jury had found him guilty, and the court beloAV had dismissed his motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. Three other defendants (Terry, Carter and Morris) were tried and con*591victed at the same time, but only Ford appealed. Tbe appellant is pressing only bis motion for a new trial.
The evidence shows that Diane, a twenty year old college junior, left ber home in West Philadelphia at 9:80 o’clock New Year’s Eve intending to join a girl friend in Germantown. At tbe intersection of Vine and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Commonwealth v. BolishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. ValloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. RansomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth ex rel. Stevens v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. PetermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. DessusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. STAINOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.