Legal Opinion
Bassett v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 1949No. Nov 28 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiffs, Thomas and Myra Bassett, as the owners and sellers of a parcel of real property in San Mateo County, brought this action against Melvin B. Johnson as the buyer of the property, to recover $500 as liquidated damages for Johnson’s alleged breach of the agreement. From a judgment in favor of Johnson the Bassetts appeal.
Johnson is a real estate broker and is a partner in the real estate firm of McGee and Johnson, engaged in business in San Carlos. The Bassetts own a piece of real property in San Carlos. Johnson telephoned to the Bassetts and asked for an exclusive listing of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Schwerin Estate Realty Co. v. SlyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hiram Lodge No. 18 v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Grimes v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Estate of CulverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Wells Fargo Bank v. KereseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Uren v. TroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952