Legal Opinion

Coal Operators Casualty Co. v. F. S. Neely Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 1951No. 4-9593PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobinson, J.

The issue involved in this appeal is whether a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance written to apply only to the State of Oklahoma should be reformed to apply to both Arkansas and Oklahoma.

The appellee, F. S. Neely Company, hereinafter referred to as Neely, is engaged in the coal mining business in Arkansas and Oklahoma. Pierce, Porter & Martin, hereinafter referred to as Pierce, are insurance agents and have been so engaged for many years in Tulsa, Oklahoma. In 1944, at the solicitation of Pierce, Neely purchased a workmen’s compensation insurance policy which was carried for two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Aetna Insurance v. ShortSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Crowell v. New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. American Alliance Insurance v. PaulSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Diana Lynn TARRANT Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. United States Ex Rel. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. H. R. Henderson & Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  4. Aetna Insurance Company v. Saul EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. Aetna Insurance v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API