Legal Opinion

United States v. Linnear

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 30, 1983No. ACM 23807PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The accused’s conduct with a cashier at a base exchange branch and a subordinate in the security police squadron resulted in his conviction by military judge alone of pandering, soliciting another to commit prostitution and sodomy in violation of Articles 134 and 125, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C.A. §§ 934 and 925. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 16 months and reduction to airman first class.

I

The accused argues there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction for pandering and soliciting another to commit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. People v. OnofreNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. ScobyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. CarrU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. CollierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. BlakeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. FaggU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. DavisU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API