Legal Opinion
In Re Fleishman
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 9, 2007No. 15-32323PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RANDALL L. DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this case, the parties seek a determination as to whether the debtors’ unborn child is a member of their household. Resolution of this issue bears directly on the duration of the debtors’ plan in chapter 13, as the size of their household in relation to their combined income determines whether the debtors’ family income is above or below the median for purposes of establishing the “applicable commitment period” for plan payments under the Bankruptcy Code. I conclude: (1) for purposes of calculating the “applicable commitment period,” the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gonzales v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Education Assistance Corporation v. William Wesley ZellnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Arnold v. Gill (In Re Arnold)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pak v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Pak)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hoopai v. HoopaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Tanya Johnson v. William ZimmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Van Bodegom SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- In Re GibsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.