Legal Opinion

Signal Mfg. Co. v. Kilgore Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1952No. 12892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

In the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, The Kilgore Manufacturing Company, an Ohio corporation, hereafter sometimes called Kilgore, brought an action against Sfgnal Manufacturing ‘Company, a California corporation, hereafter sometimes called Signal. The complaint 1 was in two counts. Count 1 charged Signal with infringing a patent (No. 1,947,834) owned by Kilgore— a patent containing 23 claims. Signal filed an answer and an amended answer and served interrogatories and requests for admissions. 2 Kilgore answered the interrogatories…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  5. Flowers v. Austin-Western Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1971
  3. Philadelphia Brief Case Co. v. Specialty Leather Products Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API