Legal Opinion

Townley v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1976No. 52284PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Counsel stipulated that the policy contained the following language: "No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy have been complied with, and unless commenced within twelve (12) months next after inception of the loss ...” Such clauses are conditions precedent to recovery and are binding against the insured. Livaditis v. American Cas. Co., 117 Ga. App. 297 (160 SE2d 449). See Code Ann. § 56-3201 at lines 157-161; Darnell v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 115 Ga.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Livaditis v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Darnell v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beck v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. MacOn-bibb County Hospital Authority v. Georgia Kaolin Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1986
  3. Farmer v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
  4. Hill v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1999
  5. Brookins v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API