Legal Opinion

Marsol Credit Co. v. West Coast Grocery Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1937No. 26608. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

December 13, 1933, the West Coast

On Grocery Company, of Tacoma, entered into a contract with the Duralith Corporation for the purchase of twenty-five tons of a product known as “Duralith.” In connection with the purchase, the grocery company gave to the Duralith Corporation three trade acceptances, payable sixty, ninety, and one hundred twenty days after date. The first trade acceptance was paid before maturing. Payment on a check issued for the payment of the second trade acceptance was stopped, as the grocery company concluded it had been defrauded.

The trade acceptances were transferred by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Keene v. BehanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Citizens Savings Bank v. HoutchensWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Gottstein v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Spokane Security Finance Co. v. DelanoWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nissen v. ObdeWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Maynard v. EnglandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Bowles v. BillikWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Marsol Credit Co. v. BlackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Higgins v. RadachWashington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API