Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Sheehan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 1993No. 23890; CA A75344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Husband appeals an order dismissing his motion to set aside a portion of a dissolution judgment. Wife cross-appeals, contending that the trial court erred in failing to award attorney fees.1 We affirm the trial court on the appeal, and reverse and remand on the cross-appeal.

Husband filed a petition for dissolution in the fall of 1977. He alleged that he was the father of the parties’ child and requested that he be ordered to pay $100 per month as child support. Wife did not appear, and the court entered a dissolution judgment in May, 1978, determining that husband is the father of the child…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. SALEM WOMEN'S CLINICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Polizos v. SkoroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API