Legal Opinion
Charlene Hill v. John F. Richardson, Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 18, 1993No. 92-3199PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
A class of persons claiming benefits under the Existing Housing Program (Title 8 of the Housing Act of 1937), 42 U.S.C. § 1437f, contended that Indiana administered the program in a way inconsistent with federal regulations. According to the complaint, Indiana disqualified tenants for reasons not listed in 24 C.F.R. § 882.210, which plaintiffs characterized as an exclusive list of considerations. The state official named as defendant eventually settled the case — capitulation is an apt description — and the district court entered a consent decree. 740 F.Supp. 1393…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Suter v. Artist M.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Webb v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richard Stomper v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 241Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Margaret G. Fisher, and Paul R. Shuldiner v. Charles Perry KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Baldwin v. Housing Authority of City of Camden, NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Reyes-Garay v. Integrand Assurance Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- Cain v. Allegheny County Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.