Legal Opinion
Zeno v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 10, 2006No. 2D05-4511PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
922 So.2d 431 (2006)
Ariel ZENO, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 2D05-4511.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 10, 2006.
Ariel Zeno, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney, Tallahassee, and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.
DAVIS, Judge.
Ariel Zeno, in his petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), alleges that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue that the trial court committed fundamental error when it inserted the conjunction "or" between his name and those of his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Ortiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Cabrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Concepcion v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dooley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Santiago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007