Legal Opinion
Doscher v. Garvin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 3, 1924No. 40PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the faets as above). The claim which has been disallowed consists of a promissory note which may he found in the margin.1 Tho note, it appears, was given as a renewal of a note executed by the company under date of May 1, 1901, to Claus Doseher, trustee, for $86,744.28. The proof of claim does not set forth the consideration for tho note.
The German-Ameriean Improvement Company, the bankrupt herein, was organized in 1891 as a land company with a paid in capital of $300,000. It acquired a large tract of land with a view to its development into residential sites. It laid out…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- In re WootenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1902
- In re Stoddard Bros. Lumber Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1909
- In re SalmonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Clapp v. HaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- San Filippo v. BongiovanniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re PovillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Ewen v. Peoria & E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. United Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- In re SolomonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.