Legal Opinion
Bahman Khadjenouri v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1972No. 71-2190Published
1Opinion of the Court
460 F.2d 461
Bahman KHADJENOURI, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 71-2190.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 11, 1972.
Allen R. Jackson (argued), of Jackson & Hertogs, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Steve Suffin (argued), INS, Richard L. Williams, Dist. Dir., INS, San Francisco, Cal., James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., William B. Spohn, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Surreck, Reg. Counsel INS, San Pedro, Cal., Henry E. Peterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., for respondent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ErricoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lee Fook Chuey, Also Known as Huey Gock Yut and Jimmie Huey v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Thomas Glenn Jolley v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Linda Lee Amarante v. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Francesco Ferrante v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Francesco Ferrante and Kathy Ferrante v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.