Legal Opinion

Dyal v. Dyal

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1941No. 28893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The judgment of a court of one State, when sued on, pleaded, or introduced in evidence in another State, is entitled to receive the same full faith, credit, and respect that is accorded to it in the State where rendered. If it is valid and conclusive there, it is so in all other States. Tompkins v. Cooper, 97 Ga. 631 (25 S. E. 247); Thomas v. Morrisett, 76 Ga. 385. Therefore, a judgment rendered by a competent court of another State is conclusive on the merits in the courts of this State when made the basis of an action or defense, and the merits can not be reinvestigated. Hope v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schulze v. SchulzeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. White v. MurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Hood v. HoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Spann v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. McCauley v. HargrovesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Guinness Plc Guinness America, Incorporated v. Thomas Joseph Ward, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Coane v. Girard Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Connell v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Grossman v. GrossmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  5. Lockman v. . LockmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API