Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doe v. Duke University

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1995No. 9414SC463Published

1Dissent

Judge Lewis

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent as to the majority’s decision to vacate the order and remand for return of the implants to defendant.

The majority holds that the order does not survive the plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal without prejudice. In so holding, they rely on the general rule that a voluntary dismissal “carries down with it previous rulings and orders in the case.” Gibbs, 265 N.C. at 464, 144 S.E.2d at 398 (quoting R.R Davis, Annotation, Effect of Nonsuit, Dismissal, or Discontinuance of Action on Previous Orders, 11 A.L.R.2d 1407, 1411 (1950)). The majority’s analysis is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Fountain v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Whitehead v. . HaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Mitchell v. Aulander Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API