Legal Opinion

Layman v. City of New Orleans

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1998No. 98-CA-0705PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

753 So.2d 254 (1998)

Arthur LAYMAN

v.

The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, Through The NEW ORLEANS CONVENTION, et al.

No. 98-CA-0705.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

December 9, 1998.

Nelson W. Wagar, III, Christa K. McKimmy, Chopin, Wagar, Cole, Richard, Reboul & Kutcher, Metairie, for Defendant-Appellee.

Matthew B. Collins, Jr., Dianne J. Marshall, New Orleans, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before BYRNES, PLOTKIN and MURRAY, JJ.

BYRNES, Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant, Arthur Layman, alleges that he was injured by a falling partition while working at the New Orleans Convention Center on February 13, 1992.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lima v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Ray v. Alexandria MallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NOSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glasgow v. PAR MINERALS CORP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. Smolensky v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001
  3. Keller v. McLeodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Glasgow v. PAR Minerals Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Glasgow v. PAR MINERALS CORP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API