People v. Longinetti
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
Part I*
Part n
By unpublished part of this opinion we find no reversible error by the trial court in accepting appellant’s plea to and sentencing him for robbery, with a five-year enhancement based on a prior felony conviction for burglary.
Appellant’s further contention is that the five-year enhancement is invalid, because it cannot be determined solely from the judgment of the *706prior conviction, that it was a burglary of a residence. We reject this contention.
Penal Code section 667 provides that a five-year “enhancement” be added to the term of imprisonment of one convicted of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. O'BRYANCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. AlfaroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. ColbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. CastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.