Legal Opinion

People v. Longinetti

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1985No. B005418PublishedCited by 10 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

Part I*

Part n

By unpublished part of this opinion we find no reversible error by the trial court in accepting appellant’s plea to and sentencing him for robbery, with a five-year enhancement based on a prior felony conviction for burglary.

Appellant’s further contention is that the five-year enhancement is invalid, because it cannot be determined solely from the judgment of the *706prior conviction, that it was a burglary of a residence. We reject this contention.

Penal Code section 667 provides that a five-year “enhancement” be added to the term of imprisonment of one convicted of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. O'BRYANCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. AlfaroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. People v. ColbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People v. CastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API