Legal Opinion · Dissent

Munn v. North Carolina State University

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 2005No. COA04-894Published

1DissentJackson, Judge

For the reasons stated below, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

*151As a preliminary matter, it must be noted that plaintiff has failed to comply with Rule 10(c) of our Rules of Appellate Procedure in preserving his assignments of error. Rule 10(c)(1) provides, in relevant part:

A listing of the assignments of error which an appeal is predicated shall be stated at the conclusion of the record on appeal, in short form without argument, and shall be separately numbered. Each assignment of error shall, so far as practicable, be confined to a single issue of law; and shall state…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Durham v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Surratt v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NA v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API