Legal Opinion

Tabor v. Hills

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.

Judgment dismissing the complaint herein is asked for under rule 112. Two alleged causes of action.are set forth, the first for an accounting of a certain piece of real property, of which property the plaintiff herein alleges she was a part owner, although title apparently was in the name of Caroline M. Hills, under a certain agreement. It seems to me that a good cause of action is stated as set forth in the first cause of action in the complaint, the plaintiff having there alleged that she furnished a part of the money used in the construction of the house. This is also urged in the second…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ThompsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. McKinley v. . HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Moore v. Bonbright & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Whitaker v. WestbergNew York Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API