Legal Opinion
In Re Bell
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1967No. Crim. 4044PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Our inquiry on this petition for habeas corpus has developed progressively. Originally we issued an order to show cause limited to the questions whether on petitioner’s arraignment in the superior court he had been suffi eiently apprised of his right to counsel and whether his express waiver of that right had been intelligent and effective.
Bell is presently confined in the California State Prison at Folsom, Represa, California, pursuant to a judgment by the Los Angeles Superior Court entered February 7, 1961, after a jury trial and verdict of guilty on two counts, one of violating Penal Code…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re VizzardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967