Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Public Education v. Watson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1960No. Appeal, No. 350Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Musmanno:

My distinguished colleague Justice Eagen begins his admirable and formidable dissent with the phrase: “I emphatically dissent!” If there were a way to emphasize “emphatically”, I would do so, for I regard the decision of the Court in this case as a most unfortunate *72one. It is one to baffle the intellect, confound the law, and set at hazard the scales in which are weighed the civic responsibilities and moral values expected of and required in a school teacher.

If Mrs. Goldie Watson, the teacher involved in this case, had publicly declared that she would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barenblatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Horosko v. Mount Pleasant Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Intille v. Hoyer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API