Legal Opinion

King v. Richardson

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1972No. Civ. No. 71-C-342Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Plaintiff King (Claimant) seeks review by this Court of the Defendant’s denial of disability benefits under 42 U. S.C.A. § 423 to which he claims he is entitled. Claimant’s claim was initially denied by a Hearing Examiner, whose decision was affirmed by the Appeals Council. The basis of the Defendant’s denial of Claimant’s claim was that the evidence does not establish that Claimant was under a disability as defined by 42 U.S.C.A. § 423 and that he can engage in existing substantial gainful employment. Claimant’s position is that such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Butler O. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Ellice C. BrianCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Hubert C. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Warren G. EarnestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. Edwards v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API