Vernon Center State Bank v. Mangelsen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action by the payee against Mangelsen and Barnes, the makers, on a promissory note. Mangelsen was not served and did not appear, but the case went to trial against Barnes and a verdict in his favor. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The note was for $800 and executed September 15, 1919. It represents money borrowed for the purchase of a tractor for farm use, Barnes signing for the accommodation of his tenant, Mangelsen. The note included the consent of the makers “that the time of payment hereof may be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. McGintyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Vanderford v. Farmers' & Mechanics' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Cellers v. MeachemOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Bradley Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. HeyburnWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Fullerton Lumber Co. v. SnoufferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Continental Mutual Savings Bank v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Koblegard Co. v. MaxwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
- Jefferson County Bank v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Peter v. FinzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.