Legal Opinion
Stough Et Ux. v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 2, 1942No. A-10070PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, P. J.
Defendants; Walter Stough and Jackie Stough, were charged in the district court of Tulsa county with the crime of conjoint robbery by means and use of force and fear, were tried, convicted and sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the penitentiary, and have appealed.
The record discloses that the defendants, Walter Stough and Jackie Stough, were husband and wife. That they were charged jointly, in Tulsa county, with Harlan Arnett and Bonnie Arnett, husband and wife, with conjoint robbery of R. F. Keene, in the city of Tulsa, Okla., on the night of January 2, 1940, by beating and wounding…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Price v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wingfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Ozbun v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- Randolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Booze v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.