Legal Opinion

Nutall's adm'r v. Brannin's ex'rs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 17, 1868PublishedCited by 8 opinions

CASE 2 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL EROJI OLDHAM CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Revised Statutes, 1 Stanton, 509-10-11. Civil Code, section 473 ; 1 Met., 24. 1 Greenleaf’s Ev., secs. 88, 560, and note. CITED— Revised Statutes, 1 Stanton, 509. 1 Grecnleafs Ev., sec. 95. Civil Code, secs. 674, 161, 896.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE PETERS

delivered the opinion or the court:

In March, 1864, appellees, executors of D. Brannin, brought an action on three several promissory notes executed by E. F. Nutall, deceased, to their testator — one on the 5th of April, 1855, and the other two on the 7th of the same month and year, amounting in the aggregate to one thousand one hundred and twenty-nine dollars and fifty-eight cents, against John C. McCreary, his administrator.

On the 10th day of December, 1864, while the first-named action was pending, they brought another action against the same defendant, alleging that on the 6th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trabue's v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Craft v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Grubbs v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Ravia Granite Ballast Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Home Insurance Co. v. WesterfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Tanner v. Ayer, Jr., AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API