Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Ravia Granite Ballast Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 11, 1917No. 7990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

On the 5th day of March, 1907, the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Frisco,” and the Ravia Granite Ballast Company, as the “ballast company,” entered into a certain contract whereby the ballast company agreed to sell and deliver to the Frisco a specified number of cubic yards of ballast at a specified price per yard, to be delivered upon the side track of the railroad company at the town of Ravia; and the essential parts of the contract necessary for the determination of this case may be stated as follows:

“Said deliveries shall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stamford Bank v. BenedictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  2. Shellabarger v. BinnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. King v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Nutall's adm'r v. Brannin's ex'rsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Valley National Bank v. ShumwayArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Nolan v. MathisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Theiler v. Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Flynn v. LowranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Wellbro Building Company v. McConnicoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API