St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Ravia Granite Ballast Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
On the 5th day of March, 1907, the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Frisco,” and the Ravia Granite Ballast Company, as the “ballast company,” entered into a certain contract whereby the ballast company agreed to sell and deliver to the Frisco a specified number of cubic yards of ballast at a specified price per yard, to be delivered upon the side track of the railroad company at the town of Ravia; and the essential parts of the contract necessary for the determination of this case may be stated as follows:
“Said deliveries shall…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stamford Bank v. BenedictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
- Shellabarger v. BinnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- King v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Nutall's adm'r v. Brannin's ex'rsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
3Cited by7 opinions
- Valley National Bank v. ShumwayArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Nolan v. MathisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Theiler v. Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Flynn v. LowranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Wellbro Building Company v. McConnicoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.